Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Omega Electronic Board Repair Co., Inc. v. United States of America

Plaintiff:Omega Electronic Board Repair Co., Inc.
Defendant:United States of America
 
Case Number:4:2009cv00307
Filed:June 2, 2009
 
Court:Texas Northern District Court
Office:Fort Worth Office [ Court Info ]
County:Tarrant
Presiding Judge:Judge John McBryde
 
Nature of Suit:Federal Tax Suits - Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause:26:7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$50,420,000.00
Search for this case: Omega Electronic Board Repair Co., Inc. v. United States of America
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Omega Electronic Board Repair Co., Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.