Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Sparks v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline

Plaintiff: Odis Sparks
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
 
Case Number: 6:2008cv00022
Filed: May 16, 2008
 
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office [ Court Info ]
County: Tom Green
Presiding Judge: Judge Sam R Cummings
 
Nature of Suit: Torts - Injury - Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause: Diversity
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Search for this case: Sparks v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Odis Sparks
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.