Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Mandujano v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) Thru It's Field Office Director

Petitioner:Jose Eduardo Mandujano
Respondent:Immigration & Customs Enforcement
 
Case Number:4:2007cv00653
Filed:February 22, 2007
 
Court:Texas Southern District Court
Office:Houston Office [ Court Info ]
County:Harris
Presiding Judge:Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr
 
Nature of Suit:P. Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause:28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Mandujano v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) Thru It's Field Office Director
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Eduardo Mandujano
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.