Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Brown v. Tenth Supreme Court of Appeal of Texas at Waco Texas

Petitioner:Kenneth Ray Brown
Respondent:Tenth Supreme Court of Appeal of Texas at Waco Texas
 
Case Number:4:2008cv00971
Filed:March 27, 2008
 
Court:Texas Southern District Court
Office:Mandamus & Other Office [ Court Info ]
County:Walker
Presiding Judge:Judge Vanessa D Gilmore
 
Nature of Suit:P. Petitions - Mandamus and Other
Cause:U.S. Government Defendant
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Search for this case: Brown v. Tenth Supreme Court of Appeal of Texas at Waco Texas
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Ray Brown
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tenth Supreme Court of Appeal of Texas at Waco Texas
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.