Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Ticer v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan

Plaintiff:Elmer Eugene Ticer
Defendant:Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan
 
Case Number:6:2008cv00196
Filed:July 15, 2008
 
Court:Texas Western District Court
Office:Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office [ Court Info ]
County:Bosque
Presiding Judge:Judge Walter S. Smith
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Search for this case: Ticer v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elmer Eugene Ticer
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.