Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name:
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Cenzic, Inc. v. Spi Dynamics, Inc.

Plaintiff:Cenzic, Inc.
Defendant:Spi Dynamics, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2007cv00734
Filed:July 27, 2007
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Alexandria Office [ Court Info ]
County:Out of State
Presiding Judge:District Judge T. S. Ellis III
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause:35:145 Patent Infringement
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Cenzic, Inc. v. Spi Dynamics, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cenzic, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]
Defendant: Spi Dynamics, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.