Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Chicago Title Insurance Company v. NGM Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Chicago Title Insurance Company
Defendant:NGM Insurance Company
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00713
Filed:June 29, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Alexandria Office [ Court Info ]
County:Out of State
Presiding Judge:District Judge Claude M. Hilton
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$100,000.00
Search for this case: Chicago Title Insurance Company v. NGM Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chicago Title Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NGM Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.