Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.
(What's this?)
What is the EasyEdit button?
This website gets better when people like you add to it. Just click the EasyEdit button to start. (help)
| Plaintiff: | Rosetta Stone LTD |
|---|---|
| Defendant: | Google Inc. |
| Case Number: | 1:2009cv00736 |
| Filed: | July 10, 2009 |
| Court: | Virginia Eastern District Court |
| Office: | Alexandria Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Arlington |
| Presiding Judge: | District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee |
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson |
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Trademark |
| Cause: | 15:1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| July 10, 2009 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Google Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683007084.), filed by Rosetta Stone LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt)(tche) |
| July 10, 2009 | 2 | Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Rosetta Stone LTD. (tche) |
| July 10, 2009 | 3 | Summons Issued as to Google Inc. for service by private process server. (tche) |
| July 10, 2009 | 4 | NOTICE of Appearance as counsel in this case for Plaintiff Rosetta Stone LTD by Terence P. Ross. (tche) |
| July 10, 2009 | 5 | Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding trademarks 2761492, 2751189, 2781324, 2866000, 3339880, 3398548, 3454358, 3514220, 3554829, 3561922, 3570033, 3570034, 3569720, 3570015. (tche) |
| July 16, 2009 | 7 | Affidavit of Service Returned Executed as to Google Inc. served on 7/14/2009, answer due 8/3/2009 (klau, ) |
| July 24, 2009 | 8 | Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Pleadings and Brief in Support Thereof by Rosetta Stone LTD, Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Frieden, Jonathan) |
| July 24, 2009 | 9 | Notice of Hearing Date set for 07/31/2009 re 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Pleadings and Brief in Support Thereof (Frieden, Jonathan) |
| July 30, 2009 | 10 | |
| August 14, 2009 | 11 | |
| August 21, 2009 | 12 | MOTION to Dismiss by Google Inc.. (Frieden, Jonathan) |
| August 21, 2009 | 13 | Memorandum in Support re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Frieden, Jonathan) |
| August 21, 2009 | 14 | Notice of Hearing Date set for 9/18/2009 re 12 MOTION to Dismiss (Frieden, Jonathan) |
| September 9, 2009 | 15 | Memorandum in Opposition re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rosetta Stone LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Ross, Terence) |
| September 14, 2009 | 16 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Frieden, Jonathan) |
| September 14, 2009 | 17 | Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Google Inc.. (Frieden, Jonathan) |
| September 18, 2009 | 18 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee: Motion Hearing held on 9/18/2009 re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Google Inc. Appearances: Terence Ross for Pltff; Jonathan Frieden,and Margaret Caruso pro hac vice, for Deft. Heard, findings stated from the bench, and granted in part and denied in part. Order to follow. (Court Reporter R. Wilson.) (tbul, ) |
| September 21, 2009 | 19 | |
| September 28, 2009 | 21 | Notice of Filing of Official Transcript re 20 Transcript. (tche) |
| October 2, 2009 | 22 | ANSWER to 1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Google Inc..(Frieden, Jonathan) |
| September 29, 2009 | 23 | |
| October 14, 2009 | 24 | Joint Discovery Plan by Rosetta Stone LTD, Google Inc..(Frieden, Jonathan) Modified text on 10/15/2009 (klau, ). |
| October 20, 2009 | 25 | Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that: a. The Proposed Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the Court ---- (see order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 10/20/09. (klau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosetta Stone LTD | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: Arlington County Intellectual Property Lawyers and Virginia Intellectual Property Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.