Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Princeton Woods, L.L.C. v. PNC Bank, National Association

Plaintiff:Princeton Woods, L.L.C.
Defendant:PNC Bank, National Association
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00905
Filed:August 13, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Alexandria Office [ Court Info ]
County:Fairfax
Presiding Judge:District Judge James C. Cacheris
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$1,350,000.00
Search for this case: Princeton Woods, L.L.C. v. PNC Bank, National Association
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Princeton Woods, L.L.C.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PNC Bank, National Association
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.