Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Weitzman v. Lead Networks Domains Pvt. Ltd.

Plaintiff:Warren Weitzman
Defendant:Lead Networks Domains Pvt. Ltd.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv01141
Filed:October 9, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Alexandria Office [ Court Info ]
County:Out of State
Presiding Judge:District Judge Claude M. Hilton
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions
Cause:15:1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$5,000,000.00
Search for this case: Weitzman v. Lead Networks Domains Pvt. Ltd.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Weitzman
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lead Networks Domains Pvt. Ltd.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.