Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Rhodenizer v. City Of Richmond Police Department

Plaintiff:Ashley L. Rhodenizer
Defendant:City Of Richmond Police Department
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00306
Filed:May 11, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Richmond Office [ Court Info ]
County:Richmond City
Presiding Judge:Magistrate Judge Dennis W. Dohnal
Presiding Judge:District Judge James R. Spencer
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:28:1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Both
Search for this case: Rhodenizer v. City Of Richmond Police Department
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley L. Rhodenizer
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of Richmond Police Department
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.