Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Romero v. Richmond School of Health and Technology, Inc.

Plaintiff:Jacqueline R. Romero
Defendant:Richmond School of Health and Technology, Inc.
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00528
Filed:August 21, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Richmond Office [ Court Info ]
County:Chesterfield
Presiding Judge:District Judge Robert E. Payne
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:28:1441 Notice of Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$600,000.00
Search for this case: Romero v. Richmond School of Health and Technology, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline R. Romero
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richmond School of Health and Technology, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.