Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Braxton v. United States of America

Plaintiff:Shamanise Braxton
Defendant:United States of America
 
Case Number:4:2009cv00090
Filed:July 20, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Eastern District Court
Office:Newport News Office [ Court Info ]
County:Newport News City
Presiding Judge:District Judge Jerome B. Friedman
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause:28:2680 Federal Tort Claim Act Medical Malpractice
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$1,850,000.00
Search for this case: Braxton v. United States of America
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shamanise Braxton
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.