Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Adkins v. Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail

Petitioner:Charles Lee Adkins
Respondent:Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail
 
Case Number:7:2009cv00353
Filed:August 20, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Western District Court
Office:Roanoke Office [ Court Info ]
County:Albemarle
Presiding Judge:Judge James C. Turk
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski
 
Nature of Suit:P. Petitions - Civil Rights
Cause:42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Adkins v. Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Lee Adkins
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.