Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Camacho v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.

Plaintiff:John A. Camacho
Defendant:Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
 
Case Number:7:2009cv00394
Filed:September 22, 2009
 
Court:Virginia Western District Court
Office:Roanoke Office [ Court Info ]
County:Alleghany
Presiding Judge:Judge Samuel G. Wilson
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Michael F. Urbanski
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Other Personal Injury
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$250,000.00
Search for this case: Camacho v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John A. Camacho
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.