Maplewood Software Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
| Plaintiff: | Maplewood Software Inc |
|---|
| Defendant: | Microsoft Corporation |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 2:2008cv00066 |
|---|
| Filed: | February 15, 2008 |
|---|
| |
| Court: | Washington Eastern District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Copyright Office [ Court Info ] |
|---|
| County: | Spokane |
|---|
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Edward F. Shea |
|---|
| Presiding Judge: | Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley |
|---|
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Copyrights |
|---|
| Cause: | Federal Question |
|---|
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
|---|
| Jury Demanded By: | 17:501 Copyright Infringement |
|---|
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| February 15, 2008 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Microsoft Corporation ( Filing fee $ 350; Receipt # SPO006253). Summons not issued. Jury Demand. Filed by Maplewood Software Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SAP, Case Administrator) |
| February 15, 2008 | 2 | Report on the filing or determination of an action involving a copyright. (SAP, Case Administrator) |
| February 27, 2008 | 3 |  ORDER OF RECUSAL by Judge Edward F. Shea. Signed by Judge Edward F. Shea. (CV, Case Administrator) |
| March 4, 2008 | 4 | ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley for all further proceedings. Judge Edward F. Shea no longer assigned to case. Clerk and Counsel shall change the initials on the case number on all future pleadings from EFS to RHW. Signed by Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley. (CV, Case Administrator) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.