Rush v. Schrubbe et al
| 1:2006cv00683 |
| June 12, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Green Bay Office |
| William C Griesbach |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on June 15, 2006. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and the initial partial filing fee is waived. IT IS ORDERED that the Secretary o f the Wisconsin Department of Corrections or his designee shall collect from the plaintiff's prison trust account the $350.00 balance of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the complain t, waiver of service form and/or the summons, and this order upon the defendants. IT IS ORDERED that the remaining defendants shall file a responsive pleading. IT IS ORDERED that the 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that copies of this order be sent to the warden of the institution where the inmate is confined and to AAG Corey Finkelmeyer. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rush v. Schrubbe et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
