Maldonado v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
|
Petitioner:
|
Daniel Z. Maldonado
|
|
Respondents:
|
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, DIVISION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS and Christopher S. Nolet
|
|
|
|
Case Number:
|
3:2008cv00279
|
|
Filed:
|
September 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
Court:
|
Wisconsin Western District Court
|
|
Office:
|
Madison Office [ Court Info ]
|
|
County:
|
Chippewa
|
|
Presiding Judge:
|
Chief Judge Barbara B Crabb
|
|
Presiding Judge:
|
Magistrate Judge Stephen L Crocker
|
|
Referring Judge:
|
Magistrate Judge Stephen L Crocker
|
|
|
|
Nature of Suit:
|
P. Petitions - Mandamus and Other
|
|
Cause:
|
28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
|
|
Jurisdiction:
|
Federal Question
|
|
Jury Demanded By:
|
None
|
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
|
Date Filed
|
#
|
Document Text
|
|
May 16, 2008
|
2
|
Order on ifp request: Petitioner to
submit Trust Fund Account Statement due by 6/5/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L Crocker on 5/15/2008. (lak),(ps)
|
|
September 22, 2008
|
23
|
ORDER granting 5 MOTION to Amend
Complaint; denying 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 11 MOTION to Supplement Complaint; denying 17 MOTION to Supplement the Record; denying 18 Second MOTION
to Supplement the Record; denying as moot 14 MOTION to Compel Warden Bradley Hompe to House Petitioner Together with Bradley Armstrong. Case DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by
Judge Barbara B Crabb on 9/22/2008. (arw),(ps)
|
|
September 22, 2008
|
24
|
JUDGMENT in favor of Christopher S.
Nolet against Daniel Z. Maldonado. (JWT/MFH) (arw),(ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should
not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.