Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:Kathleen Hardy
Defendant:Commissioner of Social Security
 
Case Number:5:2009cv00112
Filed:October 9, 2009
 
Court:West Virginia Northern District Court
Office:Wheeling Office [ Court Info ]
County:Berkeley
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Frederick P Stamp Jr
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp Jr.
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge James E Seibert
 
Nature of Suit:Social Security - Disability Insurance
Cause:42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Hardy
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.