Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. M & N Equipment LLC

Plaintiff:Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:M & N Equipment LLC
 
Case Number:2:2009cv00222
Filed:September 30, 2009
 
Court:Wyoming District Court
Office:Cheyenne Office [ Court Info ]
County:U.S. (County Unknown)
Presiding Judge:Judge William F Downes
Referring Judge:Judge William C Beaman
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:42:12101 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. M & N Equipment LLC
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M & N Equipment LLC
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.