Burtch v. Milberg Factors Inc. et al
Jeffrey L. Burtch |
Milberg Factors Inc., Capital Factors Inc., CIT Group/Commercial Services Inc., GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, HSBC Business Credit (USA) Inc., Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc., Sterling Factors Corporation and Wells Fargo Century Inc. |
1:2007cv00556 |
September 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Leonard P. Stark |
Vacant Judgeship |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 87 MOTION to Amend Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 15(a). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 7/15/2010. (nms) |
Filing 101 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 87 MOTION to Amend Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 15(a). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 6/4/2010. (nms) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 76 Objections to 75 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 5/31/2009. (nms) |
Filing 75 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT re 33 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc., TO GRANT re 35 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Joinder in and to (I) The CIT Group/Commercial Servi ces, Inc.'s Motion to Dimiss the Complaint and (II) the Motion of GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, Sterling Factors Corporation and Wells Fargo MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Joinder in and to (I) The CIT Group/Commercial Serv ices, Inc.'s Motion to Dimiss the Complaint and (II) the Motion of GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, Sterling Factors Corporation and Wells Fargo filed by Milberg Factors Inc., TO GRANT re 38 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Capi tal Factors Inc., TO DENY AS MOOTre 70 MOTION to Vacate Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the February 6, 2008 Scheduling Order filed by Jeffrey L. Burtch, TO DENY re 73 MOTION to Strike 72 Reply Brief Certain Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of His Motion to Vacate the February 6, 2008 Scheduling Order MOTION to Strike 72 Reply Brief Certain Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of His Motion t o Vacate the February 6, 2008 Scheduling Order filed by Sterling Factors Corporation, Wells Fargo Century Inc., GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, TO DISMISS 1 Complaint, filed by Jeffrey L. Burtch, TO GRANT 62 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply Brief filed by Jeffrey L. Burtch, TO GRANT re 37 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon and Joinder of Defendant HSBC Business Credit (USA) Inc. in Motions to Dismiss Filed by (I) CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc. and (II) GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, Sterling Factors Corporation, and Wells Fargo Century, I MOTION to Dismiss Based upon and Joinder of Defendant HSBC Business Credit (USA) Inc. in Motions to Dismiss Filed by (I) CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc. and (II) GMAC Commercial Finance LL C, Sterling Factors Corporation, and Wells Fargo Century, I filed by HSBC Business Credit (USA) Inc., TO GRANT re 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by CIT Group/Commercial Services Inc., TO GRANT 29 MOTION to Dismiss Based u pon Motion Of Defendants GMAC Commercial Finance LLC, Sterling Factors Corporation and Wells Fargo Century, Inc. For An Order Dismissing The Complaint filed by Sterling Factors Corporation, Wells Fargo Century Inc., GMAC Commercial Finance LLC. Objections to R&R due by 4/17/2009. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/30/2009. (rpg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.