Sonos Inc. v. D&M Holdings Inc. et al
Sonos Inc. |
D&M Holdings Inc., D&M Holdings U.S. Inc. and Denon Electronics (USA) LLC |
1:2014cv01330 |
October 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard G. Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 497 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 463 MOTION for Summary Judgment -- Defendants' Motion for Judgment on Absolute Intervening Rights With Respect to The '949 Patent --. Signed by Judge William C. Bryson on 12/7/2017. (nmfn) |
Filing 453 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 438 proposed joint pretrial order, the parties' motions in limine, a dispute regarding the election of prior art, and the Court's proposed trial procedures for the bellwether trial scheduled to begin on D ecember 11, 2017. The parties have been directed to meet and confer, and to file with the Court a revised list of deposition designations and exhibits, and objections thereto, by 2:00 p.m. on November 28, 2017. The Court will hold a conference with lead trial counsel for each party on December 5, 2017, beginning at 8:00 a.m. in Washington, D.C., to resolve each remaining objection. Signed by Judge William C. Bryson on 11/21/2017. (nmfn) |
Filing 406 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Motions for Summary Judgment (D.I. 298 , 301 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/24/2017. (nms) |
Filing 399 MEMORANDUM OPINION providing claim construction for multiple terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 8,938,637, 9,195,258, 9,202,509, and 9,213,357. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion suitable for submission to the jury. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/10/2017. (nms) |
Filing 242 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings (D.I. 116 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/13/2017. (nms) |
Filing 226 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Add the Defense of Inequitable Conduct (D.I. 176 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/3/2017. (nms) (Main Document 226 replaced on 2/6/2017) (nms). |
Filing 219 MEMORANDUM OPINION providing claim construction for multiple terms in dispute in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,571,014, 8,588,949, 8,843,224, 8,938,312, 8,938,637, 9,042,556, 9,195,258, 9,202,509, 9,213,357, 9,219,959, and D559,197. Within five days the parties shall submit a proposed order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion suitable for submission to the jury. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/12/2017. (nms) |
Filing 157 ORDER ADOPTING 143 Report and Recommendation. The Motion to Strike (D.I. 111 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/31/2016. (nms) |
Filing 143 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 111 MOTION to Strike Affirmative Defenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) filed by Sonos Inc. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consist s solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2016. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 8/10/16. (cak) |
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding MOTION to Disqualify Counsel (D.I. 19 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/9/2015. (nms) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.