Wi-Lan Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Wi-Lan Inc.
Defendant: Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation
Case Number: 1:2015cv00379
Filed: May 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Christopher J. Burke
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 574 MEMORANDUM ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the reconsideration motion (D.I. 567) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/25/22. This order has been emailed to local counsel. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 1:15-cv-00788-LPS(ntl) (Main Document 574 UNSEALED and replaced on 4/26/2022) (ntl). Modified on 4/26/2022 (ntl).
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 565 MEMORANDUM ORDER re (545 in 1:15-cv-00379-LPS)(470 in 1:15-cv-00788-LPS) Renewed Motion to Declare Case Exceptional Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 and Award Attorneys' Fees and Costs filed by Sharp Electronics Corporation, Vizio, Inc., is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/3/22. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 1:15-cv-00788-LPS (ntl)
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 515 MEMORANDUM OPINION re pending motions. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/12/19. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 1:15-cv-00788-LPS (ntl)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 470 MEMORANDUM ORDER re schedule for further briefing on the pending motions. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/2/19. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 1:15-cv-00788-LPS (ntl)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 466 MEMORANDUM ORDER re (281 in 1:15-cv-00788-LPS, 364 in 1:15-cv-00379-LPS) MOTION for Reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; (374 in 1:15-cv-00379-LPS) (290 in 1:15-cv-00788-LPS) MOTION to Strike is DENIED; (365 in 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 282 in 1:15-cv-00788-LPS) MOTION for Leave to Supplement the Initial Expert Reports of David Kennedy is DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/10/18. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 1:15-cv-00788-LPS (ntl)
April 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 280 MEMORANDUM OPINION re claim construction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/27/2018. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00379-LPS, 1:15-cv-00788-LPS(etg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wi-Lan Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wi-Lan Inc.
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Electronics Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?