BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD et al

Plaintiff: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN
Defendant: NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2007cv01421
Filed: August 6, 2007
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Ricardo M. Urbina
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151 Railway Labor Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN
Represented By: Michael Stephen Wolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.