In Re: W.A.R. LLP

Appellant: W.A.R. LLP and WADE ROBERTSON
Appellee: WILLIAM C. CARTINHOUR, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2011cv01574
Filed: August 30, 2011
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Royce C. Lamberth
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 11:8001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 27, 2012 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 1/27/12. (rje)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: W.A.R. LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: W.A.R. LLP
Represented By: Ty Clevenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: WADE ROBERTSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: WILLIAM C. CARTINHOUR, Jr.
Represented By: Patrick John Kearney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.