PEART v. LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP
DEMETRIA PEART |
LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP |
1:2013cv00537 |
April 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Rosemary M Collyer |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
05 U.S.C. § 7703 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #23 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the Court dismisses this action with prejudice. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on December 2, 2013. (lcrmc3) Modified on 12/2/2013 (rdj). |
Filing 23 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thurlow, Matthew) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Tentative Settlement by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Thurlow, Matthew) |
Filing 21 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEMETRIA PEART with Jury Demand filed by DEMETRIA PEART. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Dailey, Jonathan) Modified on 11/7/2013 (jf, ). |
Filing 20 STIPULATION Regarding First Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP. (Thurlow, Matthew) |
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' #20 Stipulation Regarding First Amended Complaint and Responsive Pleading. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A) and the Court's #19 Order entered on October 23, 2013, the Court directs Defendant to not serve another pleading responding to Plaintiff's #11 First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on October 31, 2013. (lcrmc3) |
Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Second Amended Complaint due by 11/7/2013. (cdw) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's #14 Motion to Dismiss, granting Defendant's #15 Motion to Take Judicial Notice, and denying Plaintiff's motion to take judicial notice, see Dkt. #16 . Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which is asserted in Count I, is dismissed without prejudice; Counts II, III, and IV are dismissed with prejudice; and Counts I and V remain pending. No later than November 7, 2013, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint, alleging only the remaining claims, Counts I and V, and correcting the deficiencies identified by the Court. Should Plaintiff fail to timely file a Second Amended Complaint, this case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on October 23, 2013. (lcrmc3) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on October 23, 2013. (lcrmc3) |
Filing 17 REPLY to opposition to motion re #14 Second MOTION to Dismiss filed by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP. (Thurlow, Matthew) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE re #14 Second MOTION to Dismiss filed by DEMETRIA PEART. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-6, #2 Exhibit 7, #3 Exhibit 8)(Dailey, Jonathan) |
Filing 15 Second MOTION to Take Judicial Notice by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow)(Thurlow, Matthew) |
Filing 14 Second MOTION to Dismiss by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thurlow, Matthew) |
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot #9 Motion to Take Judicial Notice in light of #13 Defendant's Notice of Withdrawal of Motion. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 6/13/2013. (lcrmc3) Modified on 6/13/2013 (rdj). |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Thurlow, Matthew) |
Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to re #10 Response to motion with signed Exhibit 6 affidavit filed by DEMETRIA PEART. (Dailey, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP with Jury Demand filed by DEMETRIA PEART.(Dailey, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by DEMETRIA PEART. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-6, #2 Exhibit cover- 7, #3 Exhibit 7, #4 Exhibit cover - 8, #5 Exhibit 8)(Dailey, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow)(Thurlow, Matthew) |
Filing 8 WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO NOTICE FILED 6/11/13.....MOTION to Dismiss by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thurlow, Matthew) Modified on 6/11/2013 (rdj). |
Filing 7 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Thurlow, Matthew) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Matthew D. Thurlow is hereby admitted to practice and appear in this Court on behalf of Defendant in this matter. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/6/2013. (lcrmc3) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Matthew D. Thurlow, :Firm- Latham & Watkins LLP, :Address- 555 Eleventh Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004. Phone No. - 202-637-1051. Fax No. - 202-637-2201 by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew D. Thurlow, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(VanBelleghem, Stacey) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Linda M. Inscoe is hereby admitted to practice and appear in this Court on behalf of Defendant in this matter. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/1/2013. (lcrmc3) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Linda Inscoe, :Firm- Latham & Watkins LLP, :Address- 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94111. Phone No. - 415-395-8028. Fax No. - 415-395-8095 by LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Linda Inscoe, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(VanBelleghem, Stacey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Stacey L. VanBelleghem on behalf of LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP (VanBelleghem, Stacey) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Civil Information Sheet by DEMETRIA PEART (Dailey, Jonathan) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/23/2013) (jf, ). |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued (1) as to LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Consent Form)(md, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT DEMETRIA PEART against All Plaintiffs LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0090-3290866) filed by Demetria Peart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Dailey, Jonathan) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (md, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PEART v. LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DEMETRIA PEART | |
Represented By: | Jonathan C. Dailey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP | |
Represented By: | Linda M. Inscoe |
Represented By: | Matthew D. Thurlow |
Represented By: | Stacey Lynn VanBelleghem |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.