BOARD OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER NATIONAL 401(k) PLAN AND JOHN MURPHY AND JOSH FRANK ITS CO CHAIRMAN v. BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION
Plaintiff: BOARD OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER NATIONAL 401(k) PLAN AND JOHN MURPHY AND JOSH FRANK ITS CO CHAIRMAN
Defendant: BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION
Case Number: 1:2013cv00741
Filed: May 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Rosemary M. Collyer
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOARD OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER NATIONAL 401(k) PLAN AND JOHN MURPHY AND JOSH FRANK ITS CO CHAIRMAN v. BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BOARD OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER NATIONAL 401(k) PLAN AND JOHN MURPHY AND JOSH FRANK ITS CO CHAIRMAN
Represented By: H. David Kelly, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?