SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff: SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Number: 1:2013cv01422
Filed: September 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 9/20/2016.(lcabj3)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 3/31/2015. (lcabj3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Represented By: Christopher S. Rizek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?