KENNEDY-JARVIS, et al. V. WELLS
| LACREASHA A. KENNEDY-JARVIS, LASHAWN D. LEWIS and DEREK JARVIS |
| CALVIN REGINALD WELLS |
| 1:2013cv01596 |
| October 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Reggie B. Walton |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons set out in this Memorandum Opinion, the Court will grant Wells's motion for summary judgment and will deny the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. See Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 7/1/2016. (lcrdm2, )
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 29 Motion to Strike; denying 31 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 35 Motion for Leave to File. Unless otherwise agreed to by both parties, the parties meet and confer conference shall take plac e telephonically on July 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. EDT, and Plaintiffs counsel shall initiate the call. On or before July 22, 2015, the parties shall jointly file the requisite meet and confer statement. The parties shall appear for a scheduling conference in Courtroom 21 on August 4, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. See Memorandum And Order for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/1/2015. (lcrdm2, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
