BELIZE BANK LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE
| BELIZE BANK LIMITED |
| GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE |
| 1:2014cv00659 |
| April 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Beryl A. Howell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0202 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 1 Petition to Confirm Foreign Arbitration Award and 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/08/2016. (lcapm3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BELIZE BANK LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BELIZE BANK LIMITED | |
| Represented By: | Kristin Graham Koehler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
