MEDISO MEDICAL EQUIPMENT DEVELOPING AND SERVICES, LTD. v. BIOSCAN, INC.
Petitioner: MEDISO MEDICAL EQUIPMENT DEVELOPING AND SERVICES, LTD.
Respondent: BIOSCAN, INC.
Case Number: 1:2014cv01440
Filed: August 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: Beryl A. Howell
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0202
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the Petitioner's 11 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on December 11, 2014. (lcbah2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MEDISO MEDICAL EQUIPMENT DEVELOPING AND SERVICES, LTD. v. BIOSCAN, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MEDISO MEDICAL EQUIPMENT DEVELOPING AND SERVICES, LTD.
Represented By: Akin M. Alcitepe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BIOSCAN, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?