GOLD RESERVE INC. v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
Petitioner: GOLD RESERVE INC.
Respondent: BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
Case Number: 1:2014cv02014
Filed: November 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 99999
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 27 U.S.C. ยง 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 41 Order on Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 11/20/2015. (lcjeb2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOLD RESERVE INC. v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GOLD RESERVE INC.
Represented By: Matthew H. Kirtland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?