BROOKS v. COLVIN
ANDRE BROOKS |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
1:2015cv00436 |
March 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Deborah A. Robinson |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Plaintiff's 42 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's 41 Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Attorney's Fees. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 1/7/2019.(DM) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 30, 2016. (NS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BROOKS v. COLVIN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ANDRE BROOKS | |
Represented By: | Christine P. Benagh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.