KISLEV PARTNERS, L.P
Plaintiff: KISLEV PARTNERS, L.P
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2007cv00625
Filed: August 22, 2007
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Mary Ellen Coster Williams
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 28 Motion for Reconsideration, or in the Alternative, for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (pn)
August 13, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 PUBLISHED OPINION amending Opinion filed on 08/05/08. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (sd1)
August 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 25 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 14 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); Status conference scheduled for 10/16/2008 at 11:00 a.m. ET.Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) Amended by Opinion filed 08/13/08(lld).
Search for this case: KISLEV PARTNERS, L.P
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KISLEV PARTNERS, L.P
Represented By: N. Jerold Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Robert J. Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?