Latell v. Sovereign Bank et al
Plaintiff: Frank Latell
Defendant: Sovereign Bank and Peter C. Triano
Case Number: 2:2013cv00565
Filed: July 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Magistrate
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 159 OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 116 Motion to Strike Jury Demand; denying 117 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 136 Motion for judicial notice of death certificate; granting 137 Motion for judicial notice of foreclosure pleadings; granting in part and denying in part 140 Motion for summary judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Santander Bank on Counts I and II of the Fourth Amended Complaint because there is no evidence which can be made admissible as substantive evidence at trial to establish that Santander Bank made a fraudulent misrepresentation. The Clerk is further directed to terminate any pending motions and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/22/2016. (RKR)
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER denying without prejudice 146 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 2/19/2016. (ANW)
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER granting 115 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Disclosure of Expert Reports and Incorporated Memorandum of Law; granting 118 Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. An Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order will be entered by separate Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 7/21/2015. (ANW)
April 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 95 OPINION AND ORDER denying 87 Motion to Dismiss or alternatively Motion to Strike Claim for Attorneys' Fees. Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental amendment to the Fourth Amended Complaint within 7 days of this Opinion and Order properly setting forth citizenship; and the time for defendant to file its answer shall begin upon its filing. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 4/24/2015. (RKR)
April 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting 88 Defendant's Third Renewed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests, permitting Defendant up to and including May 11, 2015 to respond to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Request to Pro duce; denying 89 Defendant's Unopposed Third Renewed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Adjudication of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint; granting 90 Plaintiffs' Agreed Renewed Motion for Extension of Deadli nes in Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order. The Clerk is directed to issue an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order, extending the deadlines, beginning with discovery, by 90 days. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/10/2015.(ALB)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting 76 Plaintiffs' Agreed Motion for Extension of Deadlines in Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order. The Clerk is directed to issue an amended case management and scheduling order, extending the deadlines, beginning with d iscovery, by 90 days; granting in part 77 Defendant's Second Renewed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Adjudication of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint. All deadlines in the amended case management and scheduling order, as well as disclosures and discovery, will be STAYED pending the Court's ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk is directed to add a stay flag to the case; granting 78 Defendant's Second Renewed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery Requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 1/13/2015. (BLW)
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 OPINION AND ORDER granting 52 Motion to dismiss; granting 53 Motion to dismiss; dismissing Second Amended Complaint without prejudice to plaintiffs filing a third and final amended complaint within 21 days of this Opinion and Order. If no third amended complaint is filed, the Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/13/2014. (RKR)
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER striking 61 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 8/28/2014. (BLW)
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and for Ruling on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 46 Defendants' Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to F ile Amended Case Management Report. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint, or notice that no further amended complaint will be filed, on or before July 3, 2014. The parties are granted an extension until July 17, 2014 to file an amended case management report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 6/19/2014. (BLW)
February 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting in part 33 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery; denying as moot 35 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery; denying as moot 37 Defendants' Restated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery; denying as m oot 38 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Mediation. All deadlines in the Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. 30), as well as disclosures and discovery, are STAYED for a period of 90 days from the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to add a stay flag to the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 2/28/2014. (BLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Latell v. Sovereign Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sovereign Bank
Represented By: Lawrence P. Rochefort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter C. Triano
Represented By: Lawrence P. Rochefort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Latell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?