Mayo v. Jean Nicole Hair Salons, Inc. et al
| Alexis Mayo |
| Jean Nicole Hair Salons, Inc., Douglas S. Gast and Sandra K. Gast |
| 2:2015cv00115 |
| February 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Douglas N. Frazier |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Alexis Mayo. The Plaintiff Alexis Mayo and Defendants Jean Nicole Hair Salons, Inc., Douglas S. Gast, and Sandra K. Gast's Stipulation of Dismissal 32 is GRANTED. 1. Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Count II of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Clerk if the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/3/2015. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 22 Defendants Jean Nicole Hair Salons, Inc., Douglas S. Gast, and Sandra K. Gast's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as follows: 1. Plaintiff Alexis Mayo's claims are dismissed without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff Alexis Mayo has up to and including August 25, 2015 to amend the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/11/2015. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
