Woltz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co et al
||Brandon William Walker, Sears Holdings Corp. and Sears, Roebuck & Co
||January 8, 2013
||Florida Middle District Court
||Anne C. Conway
||Karla R. Spaulding
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
|Cause of Action:
||Americans with Disabilities Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 25, 2013
ORDER adopting and confirming 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting in part 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's claims against Sears Roebuck & Co. are DISMISSED withoutprejudice. Plaintiff's claims against William Walker are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff is ALLOWED to proceed with his claims against Sears Holdings Corp. as stated in his amended complaint without payment of a filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE William Walker and Sears Roebuck& Co. as parties to this action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to MAIL summonses and Marshal 285 forms to Plaintiff for completion and return to the Court within fifteen (15) days of mailing. The Clerk is DIRECTED to PROVIDE the completed service for ms to the United States Marshals Service once the completed summonses are returned to the Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to PROVIDE a copy of the Court's Order on this amended Report and Recommendation to the United States Marshals Service. The United States Marshals Service is DIRECTED to SERVE the completed service forms upon Sears Holdings Corp. without cost to Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 2/25/2013. (SR)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.