Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC v. Arthrex, Inc.

Plaintiff: Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC
Defendant: Arthrex, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2013cv00620
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Orlando Office
County: Collier
Presiding Judge: Anne C. Conway
Referring Judge: Thomas B. Smith
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 13, 2014 101 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 100 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 6/13/2014. (Smith, Thomas)
May 14, 2014 85 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 82 Motion to Seal four exhibits and related portions of motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 5/14/2014. (Smith, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC v. Arthrex, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC
Represented By: James G. Sammataro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arthrex, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.