First Mutual Group, LP v. Perrone
Plaintiff: First Mutual Group, LP
Defendant: Dean Perrone
Case Number: 6:2014cv01759
Filed: October 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: David A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Roy B. Dalton
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying as moot 11 motion to dismiss. On or before Friday, January 30, 2014, Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 1/21/2015. (VMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: First Mutual Group, LP v. Perrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Mutual Group, LP
Represented By: Henry N. Portner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Perrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?