Dodd v. Matthews
| Brian Dodd |
| Mary Anne Ford, Thomas Dodd, Human Element Productions, LLC, Andrew Penczner, Kelly Matthews, Alex Layne, Webdiva Technologies, LLC and Christopher Oroza |
| 8:2012cv02054 |
| September 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas G. Wilson |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1367, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Count VII is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/31/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER: Plaintiff Brian Dodd's request to participate in the July 12, 2013, mediation conference by telephone 67 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/10/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: Defendant Thomas Dodd's request to participate in mediation telephonically 62 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/1/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER: Defendants Kelly Matthews, Alex Layne, Webdiva Technologies, L.L.C., Christopher Oroza, Andrew Penczner and Human Elements Productions, L.L.C.'s Motion to Compel Mediation on Friday, July 12, 2013 60 is granted to the extent that mediat ion is set for July 12, 2013. If Plaintiff Brian Dodd is unable to attend mediation in-person on July 12, 2013, he is directed to notify the Court, in writing and before 5:00 p.m. on July 8, 2013, of the specific circumstances preventing his in-perso n attendance. Upon receipt of such notice, the Court will consider allowing Plaintiff Brian Dodd to appear telephonically at the mediation conference on July 12, 2103. However, if no such notification is received, the July 12, 2013, mediation conference will take place in-person. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/28/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER: Plaintiff Brian Dodd's Motion titled "Joint Stipulated Consent to ADR / Mediation with Request to Stay" 49 and his Motion for Sanctions 54 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/19/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER appointing Peter Grilli, Esq. as mediator in this action. Defendant is directed to provide the Court, on or before June 24, 2013, with the mediation date and time. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/17/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: Defendants shall, by June 12, 2013, advise the Court of the parties' selected certified mediator and the date, time, and location of the parties' scheduled mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/31/2013. (LRM)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: Defendants are directed to serve a copy of their answer and affirmative defenses 25 upon Plaintiff on or before March 15, 2013, in accordance with Rule 5(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. The parties, including all unrepresented parties, are directed t o confer on or before March 22, 2013, for the purpose of preparing and filing a joint Case Management Report as prescribed by Local Rule 3.05, and shall file their joint Case Management Report within 14 days after the meeting. For the convenience of the parties, the Court will allow the parties to conduct the conference telephonically. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/8/2013. (MEB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
