Gilberti v. Welling et al
| Nancy Gilberti |
| Nancy Welling and David Welling |
| 8:2013cv00821 |
| April 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
| James S. Moody |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/15/2014. (LN)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Sanctions for Professional Misconduct 20 is DENIED. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 12/17/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying without prejudice 13 Motion to Substitute Party. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 11/6/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 9 is denied. Defendants' Motions for Sanction for Professional Misconduct 15 17 are denied. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/28/2013. (LN)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: Defendants' answer 4 is STRICKEN. Defendants shall file an answer that complies with Rule 8(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within 14 days. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 5 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/8/2013. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
