Clements v. DSM Supply LLC

Plaintiff: Kathy Clements
Defendant: DSM Supply LLC
Case Number: 8:2013cv01096
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Virginia M. Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 13, 2014 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $54,500.00 and thereafter to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/13/2014. (CH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clements v. DSM Supply LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathy Clements
Represented By: William Peerce Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DSM Supply LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.