Everett et al v. City of St. Petersburg et al
| Quade Everett and LaQuanda Everett |
| City of St. Petersburg, Brian Fernandez and Brian Prest |
| 8:2014cv02508 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| Anthony E. Porcelli |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER: 1. Plaintiffs' Objections to the Report and Recommendations [sic] of the Magistrate Judge 144 are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 141 is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and APPROVED in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. 3. The Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs 105 is GRANTED-IN-PART to the extent that Former Counsel, Wardell & Quezon, P.A., are entitled to a $200,000 quantum meruit fee award. 4. The Court will enter a separate order enforcing the charging lien. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/24/2017. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 25 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/12/2015. (AHH)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to Withdraw & Motion for Approval of Fee Agreement. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 5/7/2015. (FDM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
