Baker v. Portnow
Plaintiff: Regina Baker
Defendant: Arthur S. Portnow
Case Number: 8:2014cv03151
Filed: December 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Sarasota
Presiding Judge: Virginia M. Hernandez Covington
Presiding Judge: Thomas G. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 791
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER: Defendant Arthur S. Portnow, M.D., P.A.'s Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment 19 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/21/2015. (KNC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. Portnow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Baker
Represented By: Charles Duke Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arthur S. Portnow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?