Sweeney et al v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
Dennis Patrick Sweeney and Heather Renee Copher-Sweeney |
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Rockline Industries, Inc. |
8:2014cv03201 |
December 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Hillsborough |
Elizabeth A. Jenkins |
Elizabeth A. Kovachevich |
Property Damage Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 OPINION AND ORDER re: 76 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint DE 71 Motion to Dismiss, Or In the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Class Allegations, 75 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, or, Alternately, for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Class Allegations . See order for details. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/22/2016. (EJJ) |
Filing 69 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Kimberly-Clark Corporation's motion to dismiss; 42 Rockline Industries, Inc.'s motion to dismiss; and 47 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s motion to dismiss. The Complaint is dismissed witho ut prejudice, with the exception of Count III--Plaintiffs' cause of action for Breach of Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose--which is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before October 9, 2015, consistent with this Order. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 9/15/2015. (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.