Williams Holding Corporation v. Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Williams Holding Corporation
Defendant: Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC, James Pearson, Larry A. Rogers and Scott L. Rogers
Case Number: 8:2015cv00180
Filed: January 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Hillsborough
Presiding Judge: Thomas G. Wilson
Presiding Judge: James S. Moody
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendants Larry A. Rogers and L. Scott Rogers 33 is GRANTED to the extent stated herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Final Judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants Larry A. Rogers and L. Scott Rogers, jointly and severally, in the amount of $295,669.39, which reflects principal and interest to the current date. This judgment amount shall accrue post-judgment interest at the federal statutory ra te. The Clerk of Court shall close this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. The Court reserves jurisdiction on the issue of Plaintiff's entitlement to a reasonable amount of attorney's fees. Plaintiff's motion on this issue shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of this Order and shall file billing records in support of same. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/11/2016. (LN)
March 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Defendant L. Scott Roger's Motion to Dismiss Count VII of Plaintiff's Complaint 5 is GRANTED. Count VII of Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed and construed as a request for attorney's fees under the relevant causes of action. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 3/10/2015. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams Holding Corporation v. Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Williams Holding Corporation
Represented By: Brian P. Kopp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry A. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott L. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?