KRATT ET AL v. BURNS ET AL
| FRED & PEGGY KRATT and PEGGY KRATT |
| JEFFREY AND DEBORAH BURNS, DEBORAH BURNS, DONALD RUTLAND, JUDITH RUTLAND, BROWN FINANCIAL LLC, RUTLAND COMPANY, RUTLAND RESORT PROPERTIES and REGIONS BANK |
| 3:2008cv00464 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| Walton |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| ROGER VINSON |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER - Adopting 43 Report and Recommendation. - The motions to dismiss 29 filed by REGIONS BANK, and 31 filed by RUTLAND COMPANY, RUTLAND RESORT PROPERTIES, JEFFREY BURNS, DONALD RUTLAND, JUDITH RUTLAND, are Granted and thi s cause as to all Defendants is Dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dismissal of the federal claims shall be with prejudice. Dismissal of the state law claims shall be without prejudice. - Plaintiffs' 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive relief is Denied as moot. - The clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on August 14, 2009. (cbj)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER - Motions to Dismiss the initial complaint (docs 12 , 16 ) are Denied as moot. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 29 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by REGIONS BANK, 31 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Compl aint filed by RUTLAND COMPANY, RUTLAND RESORT PROPERTIES, JEFFREY BURNS, DONALD RUTLAND, JUDITH RUTLAND, 19 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by PEGGY KRATT, FRED KRATT - - It is recommended - 1. Tha t the motions to dismiss (doc. 29 , 31 ) be Granted and this cause as to all Defendants be Dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dismissal of the federal claims should be with prejudice. Dismissal of the state law claims should be wi thout prejudice. 2. That the motion for preliminary injunctive relief (doc. 19 ) be Denied as moot. 3. That the clerk be directed to Close this case. R&R flag set - Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/30/2009. . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on July 2, 2009. (cbj)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER - re 29 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by REGIONS BANK, and 31 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by RUTLAND COMPANY, RUTLAND RESORT PROPERTIES, JEFFREY BURNS, DONALD RUTLAND, JUDITH R UTLAND - Pltfs shall respond to defendants' motions to dismiss within TWENTY (20) DAYS of docketing date of this order. Response to motions due by 1/5/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on December 16, 2008.(cc: F.Kratt, P.Kratt) (cbj)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER (Of Deficiency) - re Plaintiff Peggy Kratt's Letter to the Clerk of the Court (rec'd 12/9/2008) - Clerk shall file document, but no further pleadings will be accepted unless they comply with the FRCivP and the LR of the NDFL. Additionally, Clerk shall modify docket to reflect pltf Peggy Kratt's new address: 39 Bay Circle Drive, Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32549. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on December 11, 2008.(cc: P.Kratt, F.Kratt) (cbj)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER re 16 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, 17 Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by REGIONS BANK - Pltfs shall respond to deft REGIONS BANK'S motion within TWENTY (20) DAYS from docketing this order. Response to motion due by 12/2/2008. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on November 12, 2008.(cc: F Kratt, P Kratt) (cbj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
