VISION BANK v. SEASIDE ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING INC

Appellee: SEASIDE ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING INC
Appellant: VISION BANK
Trustee: OFFICE OF THE US TRUSTEE
Case Number: 3:2012cv00153
Filed: March 30, 2012
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Santa Rosa
Presiding Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Referring Judge: CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 11:101
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VISION BANK v. SEASIDE ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: SEASIDE ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING INC
Represented By: NATASHA REVELL
Represented By: KENNETH WAYNE REVELL
Represented By: TERESA MARIE DORR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: VISION BANK
Represented By: RICHARD MARK GAAL
Represented By: ROLAND W KIEHN
Represented By: HOLLY KATHLEEN MELZER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Trustee: OFFICE OF THE US TRUSTEE
Represented By: JASON HOWARD EGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.