L et al v. JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al
| A L and P L B |
| JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, LEE MILLER, STEVE BENTON, SHAWN LARKIN, GAY WESTBROOK, MARY SUE NEVES, RICO WILLIAMS and LARRY MOORE |
| 5:2013cv00085 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Panama City Office |
| Jackson |
| GARY R JONES |
| RICHARD SMOAK |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
ORDER denying 148 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 150 Motion to Stay. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 1/6/2015. (jem)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER denying 134 Amended Motion for Partial Judgment of the Record and Partial Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 133 Motion to Admit Additional Evidence; denying as moot 116 MOTION for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 112 Amended MOTION for Summary Judgment. All of Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 10/30/2014. (jem)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 36 MOTION Exclude Additional Evidence. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 3/17/2014. (jem)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. Plaintiffs may amend their complaint not later than 10/10/2013. If Plaintiffs do not file an amended complaint by 10/10/2013, the Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/26/2013. (jem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
