Suzlon Energy A/S v. Ventus de Nicaragua, S.A.

Plaintiff: Suzlon Energy A/S
Defendant: Ventus de Nicaragua, S.A.
Case Number: 1:2010cv24648
Filed: December 29, 2010
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: Miami Office
County: Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge: James Lawrence King
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 09:0010
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 9, 2011 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 2/9/2011. (jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suzlon Energy A/S v. Ventus de Nicaragua, S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzlon Energy A/S
Represented By: Hilary K Jonczak
Represented By: Frank Joseph Sioli, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ventus de Nicaragua, S.A.
Represented By: Allan Richard Kelley
Represented By: Brian Mark Silverio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.